| |
Why another article on
tires? Because they represent essential considerations to construction
operations, and the earthmoving-vehicle manufacturers are well aware
of that fact. Don Stretch summed it up effectively once when, as
senior sales consultant for Caterpillar in Peoria, IL, he stated:
"Proper tire selection, application, maintenance, and operator training
are very important factors in earthmoving economics. Wheel tractors,
loaders, scrapers, trucks, motor graders, et cetera are earthmoving
vehicles whose productivity and payload unit cost depend greatly
on tire performance."
And Cat continues to
stress that fact, sometimes surprisingly so. Recently the company
introduced a remarkable feature for wheel loaders called Aggregate
Autodig. Using operator-programmed controls, the system permits
consistent full loading of buckets with sand or aggregate. The operator
approaches the stockpile normally, and when the system detects that
the bucket has contacted the pile, a quick lift is automatically
initiated. Then the machine goes through an algorithm of lift-and-tilt
motion to finish loading the bucket. The entire process results
in full bucket loads in a matter of a few seconds. In pointing out
the benefits of Aggregate Autodig, Cat lists maximizing the payload
per bucket, reducing operator error and fatigue, increasing productivity,
and - you guessed it - longer tire wear.
According to Cat's Bill
Campbell, "Tire wear on wheel loaders is most affected by operator
technique and traction aids [for example, limit strip differentials,
no-spin differentials, and traction control systems]. However, while
these traction aids can improve traction in poor underfoot conditions,
they can actually increase tire wear in good conditions due to tire
scuffing caused when the machine articulates. With the Aggregate
Autodig system, the programmed quick lift loads the front tires,
thereby improving tractive effort. With this automatic loading of
the tires at the beginning of the loading cycle, tire slip is minimized,
thereby increasing tire life."
With this kind of emphasis
placed on tire life and maintenance, it is not surprising that the
tire manufacturers all have aggressive programs to improve tire
performance, introducing new models to enable contractors to gain
the best possible cost-effectiveness for all their earthmoving vehicles
and all their principal applications.
What's New in Pneumatic
Tires?
 |
| Segmented
tires on a Case skid-steer. |
Dennis Munns, manager
of material handling equipment for John Deere in Moline IL, states,
"Before you can even start talking about new tire developments,
you should stress that radial tires are not being used nearly enough
in the construction industry. I'd say that 80% of all construction
vehicles should be running on radial tires and the other 20% should
only be using bias-ply tires if they have special applications where
rocks and other debris might get caught in the sidewalls of a radial
tire."
Chris Rogers, Bridgestone's
general manager of marketing in Nashville, TN, agrees with the choice
of radial tires for most construction applications and says the
construction industry probably uses a higher percentage of bias-ply
tires than any other industry. But, he contends, "The larger earthmoving
equipment found in quarries and mines have now become radialized
with very few bias tires being used. And we see a continuing shift
to radials for smaller machines, such as graders and scrapers. There
are more manufacturers of radial tires addressing the construction
market now, and this, along with the lower operating costs associated
with radials, is accelerating the industry's conversion to radials."
 |
 |
Regarding the most significant
new trend in tire design for construction vehicles, both Rogers
and Munns agree that it is the increasing popularity of low-profile
radial tires. "They have been out for three years now, and it is
only recently that they have become popular among contractors,"
Rogers says. "Not only is this acceptance trend caused by greater
familiarity with a new product, but it is being driven by performance
issues. For loader applications sensitive to stability needs, low-profile
technology improves stability by lowering the sidewall height of
the tire without changing the outside diameter. This is accomplished
[by] changing the aspect ratio to create a wider footprint and lower
sidewall [and], in some cases, sizing the rim diameter to create
a lower tire sidewall height. Stability is improved in this instance
through reduced sidewall flex and movement. The cost differential
is only 10% to 15% now, and that should narrow as sales volume increases."
That already might be
happening. Tomas Bennett, market segment manager of Michelin North
America in Greenville, SC, reports that Michelin's new XLD 65 low-profile
radial tires, designed for small- and medium-wheel loaders, are
priced only about 3% higher than comparable conventional radials.
"They are taking the industry by storm now," he claims. "The architecture
adds extra stability, gripping, and traction that help loaders increase
productivity through faster acceleration, increased cycle time,
and greater bucket penetration and fill. The numbers speak for themselves.
Compared to our Michelin 23.5R25 XHA, which has proven to be the
industry's most cost-efficient tire for wheel loaders, the XLD-65
provides 12% increase in ground contact area, 24% lengthening of
tread pattern edges, and up to 10% greater bucket penetration and
fill with the additional gripping and traction provided by this
new 65-series tire.
"What's more," he continues,
"the XLD 65's low-profile design allows loaders to accelerate faster
and with less effort, allowing operators to make more trips faster,
increasing productivity. Also, the tire's increased working deflection
and reduced sidewall height provide excellent shock absorption.
The lower center of gravity and innovative low-profile architecture
reduce vertical oscillations, decreasing rolling resistance and
pitching. These features also provide better lateral stability,
especially with a loaded bucket."
Each XLD tire adapts
easily and cost-efficiently to all existing loaders, including the
same wheel size, rim, side clearance, bucket width, and vehicle
transmission. However, Bennett says, "in new vehicle sales, OEMs
[original equipment manufacturers] tend to recommend the use of
our larger-rim tire for even better traction."
Bennett cites two other
new Michelin tires that he says have gained good acceptance by contractors.
One of them seems an unusual marketing choice: the XTS, an all-new
radial tire specifically for midsize scrapers that, he reports,
provides long tire life, resistance to damage, and a large ground-contact
area.
"Compared to our previous
scraper tire, the XTS has 8% more rubber in the tread and shoulders,
which, when combined with the square shoulder design, provides excellent
protection in tough operating conditions, therefore helping to decrease
downtime and improve cost per hour. It also delivers excellent flotation,
which contributes to its exceptional performance. The tire's cool
operating temperatures and low susceptibility to damage from impacts
and penetrations help increase productivity, while the low-rolling
resistance helps improve fuel economy. All of these attributes help
deliver low operating costs," Bennett maintains.
Michelin's introduction
of a new model specifically for the limited scraper market must
have seemed risky, but the move appears to have paid off. Out for
a little more than a year, the XTS already has generated "a big
increase in sales" over the scraper tire it replaced in the Michelin
line. And it earned the company one of Construction Equipment's
Top 100 New Products awards.
Also earning a top-100
award was Bennett's third choice, the Michelin XZSL Stabil'X' "The
first and only radial tire for skid-steer loaders yet on the market."
Bennett says the XZSL is a steel-belted radial tire with a steel
casing and special rubber compounds that increase resistance to
cuts and abrasions for fewer flats and longer tread life. It delivers
enhanced traction and handling and a smooth, stable ride. The XZSL
also features an aggressive, nondirectional tread pattern that leaves
fewer marks on concrete and pavement.
This also was a bold
marketing move because the skid-steer market traditionally has been
a price-sensitive one that almost exclusively uses low-cost bias-ply
tires. However, Bennett explains, "Michelin market research identified
niche skid-steer market segments, such as asphalt work, demolition,
and concrete applications, where bias-ply tires tended to wear out
in as little as three months. Because the XZSL has been outwearing
bias-ply tires in these applications by three to six times and is
less expensive than foam-filled tires, it has proven to be quite
popular in these severe environment applications.
"And what's more, it
now appears that the XZSL will be ideal for the new compact mini-loaders
in these applications."
Selecting the Right
Tire
The expected load on
each tire heavily influences how the best tire size and capacity
for a given application are determined. This depends on the total
vehicle weight and weight distribution. The total weight is the
sum of the weight of the typical load of material being hauled and
the bucket size added to the empty weight of the vehicle. The weight
distribution between the front and rear tires varies, depending
on the vehicle. For example, when a wheel loader is fully loaded,
it is estimated that 80% of the total weight will be borne by the
front tires and only 20% by the rear tires.
Comparing the resultant
calculation of the tonnage each tire can be expected to carry with
the tire manufacturers' tire-load and inflation charts will determine
which tires have the capacity to handle that load. "You might find
that your first choice of tire size does not have the capacity to
handle the loads you're demanding," Munns warns. "So you'll be forced
to consider a larger-tire option. Or perhaps you'll find that smaller
loads will handle the loads nicely. The point is, these charts will
give you firm capacity numbers on which you can base your final
decision."
Temperature is another
vital parameter in selecting the right tire for a given application.
According to Caterpillar Performance Handbook, the
ton-mph formula was developed to predict tire temperature buildup.
This system is a method of rating tires in proportion to the amount
of work they can do from a temperature standpoint. It utilizes the
product of load x speed to derive an index of tire temperature
buildup. Maximum tire level-off temperatures of 225°F for fabric-cord
tires and 200°F for steel-wire tires are the limits that Cat
recommends. Even at these temperatures, failures might be initiated
by overstressing the tires. Some companies rate fabric-cord tires
at 232°F or, on occasion, as high as 244°F. These higher
temperature levels are questionable under average field conditions.
Goodyear has developed
a measure that it calls the Work Capability Factor (WCF) to help
select the right tires for load-and-carry loaders, which increasingly
are being used as transport vehicles. When a loader is used to haul
material farther than 50 ft. at speeds above 5 mph, the WCF should
be applied (as described in the sidebar) to calculate the right
tire for that application.
"To find the right tire
for the application," Goodyear advises, "consult the published Work
Capability Factors for haul lengths of less than 2,000 feet one
way that have been established for each size and type of Goodyear
dozer and loader tire. Then select the tire whose WCF rate meets
or exceeds the job WCF requirement. If you have a multiple choice
of tires whose WCF rate is more than the job requires, always select
the tire with the lowest rate that will meet the requirement. In
this way, you will always have the optimum tire - that is, the best
tire for wear and durability, as well as being adequate for heat
resistance."
Overcoming Excessive
Flats
Flat tires are an annoying
interruption in any situation, but when they occur too frequently
and/or at a remote job site, they can be prohibitively expensive.
Based on feedback from contractor customers, AirBoss in South Haven,
MI, calculated the potential cost to a contractor when a flat occurs
in the field. Table 1 shows the calculation for a Bobcat 800-series
machine. The table assumes a job site that is not a great distance
from a tire dealer so that the repair, including drive time, could
be completed in two hours. Obviously this time could be much greater
for operations at a remote drive site. Similarly the assumed hourly
wage, including benefits, was just $12.50, and this will be much
higher in many parts of the country. Even using these conservative
assumptions, however, the total cost of each flat tire was calculated
to be $225.
|
Table
1. Flat-Tire Cost Analysis
|
| Direct
Costs |
|
|
A.
Flat-tire cost
($10 for repair and $35
for service call)
|
$45
2 |
| B.
Number of workers idled |
2 |
| C.
Hours of downtime required for repair |
2 |
| D.
Workers' hourly wage, including benefits |
$12.50 |
E.
Labor cost per flat (B x C x D)
|
$50 |
| Indirect
Costs |
|
| F.
Per-hour rental cost of equipment downtime |
$65 |
| G.
Hours of downtime |
2 |
H.
Indirect cost of one flat tire (F x G)
|
$130 |
| Total
Cost of One Flat Tire |
$225 |
| AirBoss
Flatproof Tire Cost Justification |
|
| J.
Cost of AirBoss tire |
$562 |
| K.
Cost of pneumatic tire |
$150 |
| L.
Incremental cost |
$412 |
| M.
Number of flats to justify flatproof tires |
2 |
Because of these persuasive
economics, contractors who work in environments where flats are
quite common are likely to consider flatproof tires. One such contractor
is Craig Kucharski of Craig Excavating Co., who reports that his
vehicles were "continually climbing curbs and constantly encountering
nails, metal, pieces of wood, concrete, rocks, and fallen trees.
In fact, I spent $5,000 on tire repairs and replacement tires in
the 12 months prior to installing AirBoss. Besides eliminating flat
tires and eliminating my stress worrying about flat-tire downtime,
the AirBoss tires are wearing great and the traction is excellent."
Although Kucharski settled
on AirBoss segmented tires, he had a variety of flatproof tire types
from which to choose. One such solution is to use totally solid
rubber tires, such as those offered by Setco of Idabel, OK, and
AirBoss. Setco Sales Manager Stephen Hadley describes his company's
solid tires: "The 100% natural rubber is adhered directly to a rim.
The rubber is reinforced with shredded, 70,000-psi tensile-strength
wire for strength, cut resistance, and extended tire wear. If you
do cut the tread face of a Setco tire, you've simply added another
tread void for traction."
Hadley concedes that
solid tires have not been widely used at construction sites other
than demolition sites. "Solid tires simply don't have the traction
that a typical construction site requires." AirBoss President Jerry
Van Vlack agrees that solid tires - including his - don't have much
place in the construction industry. He is convinced that his company's
segmented tires are the answer to ending flats at even the most
severe construction-site environments.
"A segmented tire," he
explains, "consists of a large steel rim onto which 20 or 22 thick
segments of rubber tread are bolted. Not only are these segments
much thicker than typical pneumatic tire treads, but individual
tread segments can be replaced as they wear out. Our segmented tires
have an average of 55% greater traction and double the shock absorption
of comparable-size pneumatic tires. And, of course, they are completely
puncture-proof."
AirBoss's most popular
segmented tire is its Altrakka III, which is used for grading and
excavation work mounted on skid-steer loaders, backhoe loaders,
tool carriers, wheel loaders, or trenchers. "It offers a flatproof
solution to contractors who are having flat problems with standard
pneumatic tires," Van Vlack says. "We encourage prospective buyers
to enter their operating cost data into our flat-tire cost analysis
form. Contractors who normally operate at sites covered with rubble,
rebar, nails, and the like are astonished at how much they will
save just by switching to our puncture-proof segmented tires. Avoiding
as few as two flats per tire over the 18-month tire life will completely
offset the higher initial price of Altrakka III tires." (This is
corroborated by the data presented in Table 1.)
So far AirBoss sells
primarily to end users, although its tires also are available to
OEM dealer networks. In addition, equipment rental companies are
becoming more of a market for AirBoss segmented tires. George Gillis,
a branch manager for Hertz Equipment Rental, provides insight into
why rental companies are interested: "We installed four 17.5x25
[AirBoss segmented] tires on a 621C Case front-end loader. The incidents
of flats and downtime were eliminated. Prior to installing the AirBoss
tires, the machines had 30 flat tires in a three-week period. Now
this has been a trouble-free operation for over 1,000 hours."
"They can and do charge
a rental premium on vehicles with segmented tires," Van Vlack points
out, "and they are attracted by the cost-of-ownership savings as
compared to foam-filled tires, which are really the main competition
for segmented tires."
Neil Ganz, managing director
of Galaxy Tire West of Hayward, CA, undoubtedly would challenge
that statement. Galaxy produces a foam-filled punctureproof tire,
although the company uses a polyurethane fill that it insists is
much superior to conventional foam fill. "Our Soft Flex-Super Fill
tires also provide 100% protection against flats, but they ride
like air-filled tires," Ganz claims, adding that polyurethane-filled
tires cost more than pneumatic tires, but they provide a number
of offsetting savings:
- They substantially
reduce downtime by eliminating flats and reducing the shocks and
stresses to the equipment.
- They eliminate the
need to constantly monitor tire air pressure. Once filled with
the polyurethane, they will remain pressurized to the correct
pressure for the life of the tire.
- They can be retreaded
three times without any deterioration in the performance characteristics
of the fill.
"Galaxy's poly-filled
tires are approved for use by every major equipment manufacturer
that has tested them, as well as by suppliers of critical components,
such as axles. What's more, they do not void the warranties
of these OEMs. And both the cost of the tire and the cost of the
fill are covered by Galaxy's warranty, which extends through multiple
retreadings."
Now Galaxy is branching
out into other specialty tires. Its new L-6S super heavy-duty bias-ply
tire has a 40% deeper tread than does an L-5, but its overall diameter
is exactly the same. With 24 actual plies, it can withstand severe
cuts that would cripple a tire with just 12 actual plies.
"Originally we planned
to market the L-6S as a poly-filled tire," Ganz recalls, "but then
a customer, American Ref-Fuel, changed our minds. For years, American
Ref-Fuel foam-filled every tire. When we came out with the L-6S,
they decided to test the first set to see if the added depth and
additional plies would result in less severe cutting and, therefore,
less downtime. The results were so positive that today they run
12 Volvo machines without foam fill, saving thousands of dollars
in the cost of the foam and repairs to the machines.
"Moreover, with its deeper
tread and a super-strong carcass, the L06S can be retreaded too.
So far every Galaxy L-6 tire has been retreaded an average of three
times. With this added life, we are convinced that the L-6S has
the lowest cost per hour of any tire in the world used on these
super-severe waste operations."
How About Tracks?
In the article "Getting
Over the Terrain: When to Use Tracks or Tires" in the March/April
2000 issue of Grading & Excavation Contractor, John Deere's
Kirk Kessler stated that determining whether wheeled or tracked
equipment should be used for a specific job is a pretty simple thing.
"If you've got a situation in which you're either working on grades
that are too steep for a rubber-tired machine to negotiate or your
ground conditions are so poor that you don't have the tractive effort
and get stuck too easily with the rubber-tired machine, you use
tracks. If you're concerned about ground compaction - you don't
want to compact the ground too much - then switch from tires to
tracks."
But which tracks? Steel
is the dominant material for tracks because steel tracks can provide
the traction needed for most applications. In many instances, however,
either rubber or polyurethane pads or rubber tracks are desirable
in order to minimize the impact on the surfaces that the vehicles
operate on. "If you're always working in dirt, you won't need to
protect the surface," maintains Barry Stoughton, president of BLS
Enterprises in Elk Grove Village, IL. "But if you're working in
an area of paved streets, on asphalt or concrete, or even on grass,
steel tracks could tear up the surface that you're working on. That
would dictate the use of rubber pads or polyurethane-covered steel
pads.
"While rubber pads have
certain applications, they have a tendency to chunk out in rough
environments. In contrast, polyurethane has a longer life, lasting
two to three times longer than rubber pads. The polyurethane-covered
steel pads wear like they're being sanded down versus chunking out
- but they are significantly more expensive."
Bridgestone Industrial
Products of America markets continuous rubber tracks and rubber
pads. Drew Minwegan, director of OEM products, explains the rationale
for rubber tracks: "Tires and steel tracks each have unique features
[that] can make them ideally suited to specific applications and
environments. However, a gap exists when equipment and the operating
environment would be best served by a blend between these two drive
mechanisms. This gap is effectively bridged by the combination of
the positive attributes of both tires and steel tracks by utilizing
rubber tracks. These tracks enable a machine to operate in conditions
where low ground pressure and high tractive effort are needed while
minimizing the damage to the operating surface."
Offering excellent traction
and durability, continuous rubber tracks appear to be a viable choice
for any compact construction machine. In the construction industry,
they are used on skid-steer loaders, mini-excavators, asphalt pavers,
dozers, tracked carriers, and boring and trenching machines.
"Mini-excavators have
become the largest category of construction vehicles using our rubber
tracks," Minwegan says. "Long popular in Japan, these vehicles are
now a rapidly growing portion of the construction equipment base
in North America, and our continuous rubber tracks are ideal for
that vehicle size and application. Continuous rubber tracks have
a metal infrastructure that is entirely embossed with a continuous
rubber loop. This allows vehicles to go across finish surfaces,
to eliminate track noise, and to absorb the shock from ground impact
for a smoother ride."
Many aftermarket suppliers
sell over-the-tire tracks and rubber track conversion kits, thereby
providing users with the flexibility to convert their smaller vehicles
from tires to tracks and back again. For example, Mattracks Inc.
of Karlstad, MN, supplies a rubber track conversion system for 4x4
1.5-ton trucks and service vehicles. Marketing Manager Del Wright
says the system is particularly well suited for providing crew access
and emergency access via the four-wheel-drive trucks to and from
remote work sites before any roads are in place. He claims that
they work equally well in sand, mud, or snow and that a tire can
be removed and replaced by a track in less than half an hour.
BLS Enterprises distributes
an over-the-tire system, called Protrac, for skid-steers. These
tracks use bolt-on replaceable/interchangeable pads that are fully
reusable, thus allowing low-cost maintenance. The system can be
provided with either (1) a rubber shoe assembly that provides maximum
protection when used even on easily damaged surfaces or (2) a magnesium
shoe assembly that offers better traction in muddy, swampy, or wet
conditions.
While conceding the flexibility
benefits afforded by interchangeable tire-to-track-to-tire systems,
Minwegan says Bridgestone made a conscious decision to design and
market its continuous rubber tracks as part of an undercarriage
system, thus optimizing track performance. "When you put tracks
over tires, you are pulling in opposition to where you need your
chains to be," he says. "Therefore, we pass up that conversion flexibility
and work with the vehicle OEMs so that the contractor gets an optimized
undercarriage system with integrated tracks."
So there you have it.
The OEMs and the tire/track suppliers are working inventively and
effectively to produce products and systems optimized for each construction
vehicle and each construction application. And the construction
industry is beginning to respond to these developments and expanded
choices and see them as a part of their overall contractor productivity
enhancement programs.
Author
Charles D. Bader is with Dateline II Communications in Los Angeles,
CA.
GEC
- July/August 2003
|
|